<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ship date for Intel-based Macs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul The UnixCentric</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul The UnixCentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Now I remember why I don&#039;t read anything with Russell Beattie&#039;s name on it; he ranks up there in stupidty with Steve Dotto and the man who is the pinnacle of making the IT industry look bad, Leo Laporte.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Weak isn&#039;t a strong enough word for that write-up. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And as for that last link...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&quot;But Intel doesn&#039;t care what Apple wants&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Heh. if Apple still can&#039;t see its&#039; own mistake after that, they ARE morons.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I remember why I don&#8217;t read anything with Russell Beattie&#8217;s name on it; he ranks up there in stupidty with Steve Dotto and the man who is the pinnacle of making the IT industry look bad, Leo Laporte.</p>

<p>Weak isn&#8217;t a strong enough word for that write-up. ;-)</p>

<p>And as for that last link&#8230;</p>

<p><em><strong>&#8220;But Intel doesn&#8217;t care what Apple wants&#8221;</strong></em></p>

<p>Heh. if Apple still can&#8217;t see its&#8217; own mistake after that, they ARE morons.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26433&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looks like June is out...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26433" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26433</a></p>

<p>Looks like June is out&#8230;</p>

<p>*</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The included OSX apps, whether you use them or not are certainly better than mindsweeper and paint, which in themselves comprise about half of XP&#039;s included applications.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now every OS is sadly underwhelming...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The included OSX apps, whether you use them or not are certainly better than mindsweeper and paint, which in themselves comprise about half of XP&#8217;s included applications.</p>

<p>Right now every OS is sadly underwhelming&#8230;</p>

<p>*</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Other than his complaints about the hardware, most of his complaints are bogus.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah that whole post was kinda weak.  I was expecting something a bit more profound.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Other than his complaints about the hardware, most of his complaints are bogus.</blockquote>

<p>Yeah that whole post was kinda weak.  I was expecting something a bit more profound.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3093</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3093</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Other than his complaints about the hardware, most of his complaints are bogus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Iâ€™m not a musician, GarageBand to me isnâ€™t particularly compelling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s like saying, &quot;I&#039;m not a gamer, Flight Simulator to me isn&#039;t particularly compelling.&quot; Is that really a reason not to use Windows?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than his complaints about the hardware, most of his complaints are bogus.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Iâ€™m not a musician, GarageBand to me isnâ€™t particularly compelling.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>That&#8217;s like saying, &#8220;I&#8217;m not a gamer, Flight Simulator to me isn&#8217;t particularly compelling.&#8221; Is that really a reason not to use Windows?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008631.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008631.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1008631.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Forgot about that 5400rpm drive.  That was the best computer related $50 I&#039;ve ever spent.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot about that 5400rpm drive.  That was the best computer related $50 I&#8217;ve ever spent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul The UnixCentric</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul The UnixCentric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve got your wires crossed, Todd.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although, granted, a 4200rpm HDD is enough to make any machine seem slow, there&#039;s nothing Wintel can do that Motorola or Sun can&#039;t outdo with ease. If Apple thinks greed is a viable reason to turn all of their products from gold to garbage, then that&#039;s their problem. The CPU speed issue is a media brainwash; all processor types are affected by the 90nm barrier, and dual-core is just dual-processor. Don&#039;t be fooled by the hype. Wintel will never be their own wet dream, no matter how much they publically stroke their own egos...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree with Gabe, Matt. Doubling my RAM to a gig made a difference almost as noticeable as buying a whole new machine. However, if money&#039;s not a big issue, you might also consider getting a 5400rpm HDD as well. The only slowness I notice on this l&#039;il beastie is during times of heavy drive access. If / when I can get the faster drive, I will.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, the effects that current upgrade tricks like upping RAM have won&#039;t work anymore once the x86 comes. They don&#039;t work as well -- double the RAM in a PC and notice how much less a difference it makes. Guess Apple didn&#039;t stop to consider &lt;em&gt;important&lt;/em&gt; things like this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got your wires crossed, Todd.</p>

<p>Although, granted, a 4200rpm HDD is enough to make any machine seem slow, there&#8217;s nothing Wintel can do that Motorola or Sun can&#8217;t outdo with ease. If Apple thinks greed is a viable reason to turn all of their products from gold to garbage, then that&#8217;s their problem. The CPU speed issue is a media brainwash; all processor types are affected by the 90nm barrier, and dual-core is just dual-processor. Don&#8217;t be fooled by the hype. Wintel will never be their own wet dream, no matter how much they publically stroke their own egos&#8230;</p>

<p>I agree with Gabe, Matt. Doubling my RAM to a gig made a difference almost as noticeable as buying a whole new machine. However, if money&#8217;s not a big issue, you might also consider getting a 5400rpm HDD as well. The only slowness I notice on this l&#8217;il beastie is during times of heavy drive access. If / when I can get the faster drive, I will.</p>

<p>Of course, the effects that current upgrade tricks like upping RAM have won&#8217;t work anymore once the x86 comes. They don&#8217;t work as well &#8212; double the RAM in a PC and notice how much less a difference it makes. Guess Apple didn&#8217;t stop to consider <em>important</em> things like this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your Powerbook was slow when you bought it, that&#039;s why they&#039;re switching to Intel. ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Powerbook was slow when you bought it, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re switching to Intel. ;)</p>

<p>*</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-3083</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2005/09/22/ship-date-for-intel-based-macs/#comment-3083</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Slow?  Don&#039;t you run terminal most of the time?  Try running Adobe: Indesign, Photoshop, ImageReady, and Illustrator while keeping nice with the corporate email via Entourage.  Oh and add Dashboard in there.  Yet I&#039;ve gotta say, I have yet to find my 1.5ghz Powerbook slow in any way really.  I&#039;d recommend doubling your ram for some speed improvement while you&#039;re waiting for those X86 Powerbooks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slow?  Don&#8217;t you run terminal most of the time?  Try running Adobe: Indesign, Photoshop, ImageReady, and Illustrator while keeping nice with the corporate email via Entourage.  Oh and add Dashboard in there.  Yet I&#8217;ve gotta say, I have yet to find my 1.5ghz Powerbook slow in any way really.  I&#8217;d recommend doubling your ram for some speed improvement while you&#8217;re waiting for those X86 Powerbooks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
