<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed icon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/01/04/feed-icon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/01/04/feed-icon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/01/04/feed-icon/comment-page-1/#comment-3691</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/01/04/feed-icon/#comment-3691</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Um...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suppose it&#039;s all well and good that MS and the Mozilla team have decided to cooperate... But did any of them stop to look and see if the symbol they&#039;re now promoting was already in standard use elsewhere? I think not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That symbol -- angled, tilted, or whatever -- has been the accepted symbol for wireless sources for some time now, from RF to WiFi.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hell, even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.circuitcity.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Circuit City&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; takeover of what many Canadians once knew as Radio Shack &lt;em&gt;(now called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesourcecc.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Source&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/em&gt; has stolen the same iconic representation, added an additional 45 degree-or-so tilt, and claimed it as &lt;strong&gt;their&lt;/strong&gt; logo as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmph. &quot;Standards&quot;. Does any organization or business even know the definition of the word anymore?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not only can this too-often-stolen symbol cause confusion &lt;em&gt;(I don&#039;t particularly care for the letter icons either, if it matters)&lt;/em&gt; because of its&#039; incessant re-application, but I see this as just one more case of those who steal intellectual property being positively instead of negatively reinforced.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Surely the human race hasn&#039;t run out of possible symbols or iconic representations already, that we have to redefine and dilute old tried-and-true ones?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;</p>

<p>I suppose it&#8217;s all well and good that MS and the Mozilla team have decided to cooperate&#8230; But did any of them stop to look and see if the symbol they&#8217;re now promoting was already in standard use elsewhere? I think not.</p>

<p>That symbol &#8212; angled, tilted, or whatever &#8212; has been the accepted symbol for wireless sources for some time now, from RF to WiFi.</p>

<p>Hell, even <a href="http://www.circuitcity.com/" rel="nofollow">Circuit City&#8217;s</a> takeover of what many Canadians once knew as Radio Shack <em>(now called <a href="http://www.thesourcecc.com/" rel="nofollow">The Source</a>)</em> has stolen the same iconic representation, added an additional 45 degree-or-so tilt, and claimed it as <strong>their</strong> logo as well.</p>

<p>Hmph. &#8220;Standards&#8221;. Does any organization or business even know the definition of the word anymore?</p>

<p>Not only can this too-often-stolen symbol cause confusion <em>(I don&#8217;t particularly care for the letter icons either, if it matters)</em> because of its&#8217; incessant re-application, but I see this as just one more case of those who steal intellectual property being positively instead of negatively reinforced.</p>

<p>Surely the human race hasn&#8217;t run out of possible symbols or iconic representations already, that we have to redefine and dilute old tried-and-true ones?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

