Comments on: http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/11/27/1301/ Stuff that I'm thinking about. Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:34:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Lindsey http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/11/27/1301/#comment-9425 Lindsey Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:47:31 +0000 http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/11/27/1301/#comment-9425 <p>Actually, I'm all for alphabetical organization. That way, it's easier to tell at a glance whether the property you're looking for is there or not. But I guess that if you don't have the property names pretty much committed to memory, then grouping related properties might be better.</p> <p><em>sigh</em> My CSS has gotten pretty rusty in the last six months. That style sheet I did for the last CR might have been my high point -- and that was far from perfect.</p> Actually, I’m all for alphabetical organization. That way, it’s easier to tell at a glance whether the property you’re looking for is there or not. But I guess that if you don’t have the property names pretty much committed to memory, then grouping related properties might be better.

sigh My CSS has gotten pretty rusty in the last six months. That style sheet I did for the last CR might have been my high point — and that was far from perfect.

]]> By: Emil Stenström http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/11/27/1301/#comment-9279 Emil Stenström Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:04:23 +0000 http://www.matthewgifford.com/2006/11/27/1301/#comment-9279 <p>Yeah, I would recommend it :P </p> <p>Alphabetic ordering or not is really not that important, I just hate coming to a new project and finding that the CSS is a mess. Everything but a mess is better :)</p> Yeah, I would recommend it :P

Alphabetic ordering or not is really not that important, I just hate coming to a new project and finding that the CSS is a mess. Everything but a mess is better :)

]]>