<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/comment-page-1/#comment-20627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 03:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/#comment-20627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Recently Firefox has been tanking on me for no reason as well.  I&#039;ve had Firefox memory footprints at around 1,500MB+ in the past with no issues (XP not OSX), but recently it will just hang on me even in the 100-200MB range.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Same issue in both 1.5.x and 2.0.x...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently Firefox has been tanking on me for no reason as well.  I&#8217;ve had Firefox memory footprints at around 1,500MB+ in the past with no issues (XP not OSX), but recently it will just hang on me even in the 100-200MB range.</p>

<p>Same issue in both 1.5.x and 2.0.x&#8230;</p>

<p>*</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/comment-page-1/#comment-18736</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/#comment-18736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For me, Fx&#039;s virtual memory usage is often really high &lt;em&gt;(422M as of writing this; Fx has been running without restart for about 2 days)&lt;/em&gt;, but the real memory footprint hasn&#039;t been abnormal for ages. Never seems to go above about 100M -- and that&#039;s only if it&#039;s been running constantly for over a week. I remember it being higher when I tried using RSS feeds, but not since. Not sure why it does that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While we&#039;re on the topic of Fx&#039;s flaws, is there any hope of ever being saved from the constant and endless &lt;code&gt;bookmarks.html&lt;/code&gt; duplicates? It was funny for the first few times, but regularly having to trash and delete &lt;code&gt;bookmarks-1.html&lt;/code&gt; thru &lt;code&gt;bookmarks-231.html&lt;/code&gt; is getting plain stupid. And no, I have no add-ons that work with bookmark files, so I know it&#039;s Fx itself.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, Fx&#8217;s virtual memory usage is often really high <em>(422M as of writing this; Fx has been running without restart for about 2 days)</em>, but the real memory footprint hasn&#8217;t been abnormal for ages. Never seems to go above about 100M &#8212; and that&#8217;s only if it&#8217;s been running constantly for over a week. I remember it being higher when I tried using RSS feeds, but not since. Not sure why it does that.</p>

<p>While we&#8217;re on the topic of Fx&#8217;s flaws, is there any hope of ever being saved from the constant and endless <code>bookmarks.html</code> duplicates? It was funny for the first few times, but regularly having to trash and delete <code>bookmarks-1.html</code> thru <code>bookmarks-231.html</code> is getting plain stupid. And no, I have no add-ons that work with bookmark files, so I know it&#8217;s Fx itself.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/comment-page-1/#comment-18696</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/#comment-18696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Totally forgot about Firebug. I&#039;m going to add that to the post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally forgot about Firebug. I&#8217;m going to add that to the post.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/comment-page-1/#comment-18693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/#comment-18693</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The only reason I use Firefox for Mac is because of Firebug.  But I have to restart the browser  every 3 hours in order to get my system back - FF simply hogs all the resources.  Camino is my browser of choice, and it will run AJAX apps (Google Mail, Calendar, etc.) for days without any interupts or need to restart.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I use Firefox for Mac is because of Firebug.  But I have to restart the browser  every 3 hours in order to get my system back &#8211; FF simply hogs all the resources.  Camino is my browser of choice, and it will run AJAX apps (Google Mail, Calendar, etc.) for days without any interupts or need to restart.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heide</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/comment-page-1/#comment-18678</link>
		<dc:creator>heide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewgifford.com/2007/04/24/1334/#comment-18678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Firefox&#039;s memory and CPU usage has been getting a bit silly on my iBook too (currently 217MB of RSS mem and 47% CPU after three days open), but it&#039;s still been usable as far as interactivity goes.  As long as I don&#039;t have to do anything else memory or CPU-intensive...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox&#8217;s memory and CPU usage has been getting a bit silly on my iBook too (currently 217MB of RSS mem and 47% CPU after three days open), but it&#8217;s still been usable as far as interactivity goes.  As long as I don&#8217;t have to do anything else memory or CPU-intensive&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

